Published: August 19, 2025
The book in...
One sentence:
A long-winded list of 'rules' that for the most part seem likely to produce better rather than worse outcomes if followed.
Five sentences:
Peterson uses meandering stories and exceedingly disconnected examples to make cases for his rules. He doesn't hide his literary slant and it feels like he is writing to show off his vocabulary and force his voice through the pages. That said, the rules are reasonable and would almost certainly provide a good starting point for anyone, but particularly young men, that might feel unmoored in today's social and political world. On one hand he makes a lot of calls back to biblical references, which in my bias opinion is a good foundation for rules for life, but on the other he regularly uses the trope of 'Hitler bad' (to his credit he also points out Lenin, Stalin, and Mao as well) which feels exceedingly weak in modern arguments. Overall I would say that while you might find the book useful it is quite a slog to get through if you are looking to get right to the point, but that might be a benefit to others that want to take their time and read some subjectively interesting stories while slowly absorbing the 12 rules.
designates my notes. / designates important. / designates very important.
Thoughts
Peterson has an extensive vocabulary and makes use of it. A lot of it feels
superfluous. It reads as if written by someone trying to display their intellect
and/or hit a particular word count. That isn’t to say it is bad, but it is
certainly long-winded. He mentioned several times his literary passion. It
shows. The wit is there. The brevity is not.
He uses Hitler, and to a lesser extent Stalin and Mao, to browbeat the reader
time and time again with contrapositions.
Exceptional Quotes
-
Question for parents: do you want to make your children safe, or strong?
-
you have a spark of the divine in you, which belongs not to you, but to God.
-
Happy” is by no means synonymous with “good.”
-
You must determine where you are going, so that you can bargain for
yourself, so that you don’t end up resentful, vengeful and cruel. You have to
articulate your own principles, so that you can defend yourself against others’
taking inappropriate advantage of you, and so that you are secure and safe while
you work and play. You must discipline yourself carefully. You must keep the
promises you make to yourself, and reward yourself, so that you can trust and
motivate yourself. You need to determine how to act toward yourself so that you
are most likely to become and to stay a good person. It would be good to make
the world a better place.
-
Don’t underestimate the power of vision and direction. These are irresistible
forces, able to transform what might appear to be unconquerable obstacles into
traversable pathways and expanding opportunities. Strengthen the individual.
Start with yourself. Take care with yourself. Define who you are. Refine your
personality. Choose your destination and articulate your Being. As the great
nineteenth-century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche so brilliantly noted,
“He whose life has a why can bear almost any how.”61
-
Perhaps happiness is always to be found in the journey uphill, and not in the
fleeting sense of satisfaction awaiting at the next peak. Much of happiness is
hope, no matter how deep the underworld in which that hope was conceived.
-
What you aim at determines what you see.
-
“Wait,” you think. “Maybe I’m not unhappy because I don’t have my boss’s job.
Maybe I’m unhappy because I can’t stop wanting that job.”
-
To journey happily may well be better than to arrive successfully.…
-
Each person’s private trouble cannot be solved by a social revolution, because
revolutions are destabilizing and dangerous. We have learned to live together
and organize our complex societies slowly and incrementally, over vast stretches
of time, and we do not understand with sufficient exactitude why what we are
doing works. Thus, altering our ways of social being carelessly in the name of
some ideological shibboleth (diversity springs to mind) is likely to produce far
more trouble than good, given the suffering that even small revolutions
generally produce.
-
Start to stop doing what you know to be wrong. Start stopping today.
-
But excuses—even reasons—even understandable reasons—don’t matter; not in the
final analysis.
-
Maybe it’s not the world that’s at fault. Maybe it’s you.
-
To have meaning in your life is better than to have what you want
-
rationality is subject to the single worst temptation—to raise what it knows
now to the status of an absolute.
-
Here’s the fundamental problem: group identity can be fractionated right
down to the level of the individual.
Table of Contents
page 24:
- People who live by the same code are rendered mutually predictable to one
another. They act in keeping with each other’s expectations and desires. They
can cooperate. They can even compete peacefully, because everyone knows what to
expect from everyone else. A shared belief system, partly psychological, partly
acted out, simplifies everyone—in their own eyes, and in the eyes of others.
page 27:
- How could the world be freed from the terrible dilemma of conflict, on the one
hand, and psychological and social dissolution, on the other? The answer was
this: through the elevation and development of the individual, and through the
willingness of everyone to shoulder the burden of Being and to take the heroic
path. We must each adopt as much responsibility as possible for individual life,
society and the world. We must each tell the truth and repair what is in
disrepair and break down and recreate what is old and outdated. It is in this
manner that we can and must reduce the suffering that poisons the world. It’s
asking a lot. It’s asking for everything. But the alternative—the horror of
authoritarian belief, the chaos of the collapsed state, the tragic catastrophe
of the unbridled natural world, the existential angst and weakness of the
purposeless individual—is clearly worse.
page 33:
- When the aristocracy catches a cold, as it is said, the working class dies of
pneumonia.
page 37:
- It’s winner-take-all in the lobster world, just as it is in human societies,
where the top 1 percent have as much loot as the bottom 50 percent11—and where
the richest eighty-five people have as much as the bottom three and a half
billion.
page 43:
- There is little more natural than culture. Dominance hierarchies are older
than trees.
page 46:
-
I always ask my clinical clients first about sleep. Do they wake up in the
morning at approximately the time the typical person wakes up, and at the same
time every day? If the answer is no, fixing that is the first thing I recommend.
It doesn’t matter so much if they go to bed at the same time each evening, but
waking up at a consistent hour is a necessity.
-
The systems that mediate negative emotion are tightly tied to the properly
cyclical circadian rhythms.
-
The next thing I ask about is breakfast. I counsel my clients to eat a fat and
protein-heavy breakfast as soon as possible after they awaken (no simple
carbohydrates, no sugars, as they are digested too rapidly, and produce a
blood-sugar spike and rapid dip). This is because anxious and depressed people
are already stressed, particularly if their lives have not been under control
for a good while. Their bodies are therefore primed to hypersecrete insulin, if
they engage in any complex or demanding activity. If they do so after fasting
all night and before eating, the excess insulin in their bloodstream will mop up
all their blood sugar. Then they become hypoglycemic and psycho-physiologically
unstable.22 All day. Their systems cannot be reset until after more sleep. I
have had many clients whose anxiety was reduced to subclinical levels merely
because they started to sleep on a predictable schedule and eat breakfast.
page 53:
- To say it again: There is very little difference between the capacity for
mayhem and destruction, integrated, and strength of character. This is one of
the most difficult lessons of life.
page 54:
- Alterations in body language offer an important example. If you are asked by a
researcher to move your facial muscles, one at a time, into a position that
would look sad to an observer, you will report feeling sadder. If you are asked
to move the muscles one by one into a position that looks happy, you will report
feeling happier. Emotion is partly bodily expression, and can be amplified (or
dampened) by that expression.29
page 61:
- People are better at filling and properly administering prescription
medication to their pets than to themselves.
page 74:
- Question for parents: do you want to make your children safe, or strong?
page 79:
- Perhaps Heaven is something you must build, and immortality something you must
earn.
page 83:
We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.
Through the unknown, remembered gate
When the last of earth left to discover
Is that which was the beginning;
At the source of the longest river
The voice of the hidden waterfall
And the children in the apple-tree
Not known, because not looked for
But heard, half-heard, in the stillness
Between two waves of the sea.
Quick now, here, now, always—
A condition of complete simplicity
(Costing not less than everything)
And all shall be well and
All manner of things shall be well
When the tongues of flames are in-folded
Into the crowned knot of fire
And the fire and the rose are one.
(“Little Gidding,” Four Quartets, 1943)
- T.S. Elliot
page 85:
- I learned two very important lessons from Carl Jung, the famous Swiss depth
psychologist, about “doing unto others as you would have them do unto you” or
“loving your neighbour as yourself.” The first lesson was that neither of these
statements has anything to do with being nice. The second was that both are
equations, rather than injunctions. If I am someone’s friend, family member, or
lover, then I am morally obliged to bargain as hard on my own behalf as they are
on theirs. If I fail to do so, I will end up a slave, and the other person a
tyrant. What good is that? It much better for any relationship when both
partners are strong. Furthermore, there is little difference between standing up
and speaking for yourself, when you are being bullied or otherwise tormented and
enslaved, and standing up and speaking for someone else. As Jung points out,
this means embracing and loving the sinner who is yourself, as much as forgiving
and aiding someone else who is stumbling and imperfect.
page 86:
- you have a spark of the divine in you, which belongs not to you, but to God.
page 87:
- We deserve some respect. You deserve some respect. You are important to other
people, as much as to yourself. You have some vital role to play in the
unfolding destiny of the world. You are, therefore, morally obliged to take care
of yourself. You should take care of, help and be good to yourself the same way
you would take care of, help and be good to someone you loved and valued.
page 88:
-
Happy” is by no means synonymous with “good.”
-
You must determine where you are going, so that you can bargain for
yourself, so that you don’t end up resentful, vengeful and cruel. You have to
articulate your own principles, so that you can defend yourself against others’
taking inappropriate advantage of you, and so that you are secure and safe while
you work and play. You must discipline yourself carefully. You must keep the
promises you make to yourself, and reward yourself, so that you can trust and
motivate yourself. You need to determine how to act toward yourself so that you
are most likely to become and to stay a good person. It would be good to make
the world a better place.
-
Don’t underestimate the power of vision and direction. These are irresistible
forces, able to transform what might appear to be unconquerable obstacles into
traversable pathways and expanding opportunities. Strengthen the individual.
Start with yourself. Take care with yourself. Define who you are. Refine your
personality. Choose your destination and articulate your Being. As the great
nineteenth-century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche so brilliantly noted,
“He whose life has a why can bear almost any how.”61
page 99:
- Ed had had taken some job— lawn-mowing and casual landscaping—which would have
been fine for a part-time university student or for someone who could not do
better but which was wretchedly low-end as a career for an intelligent person.
page 103:
-
In a fit of inspiration, the well-meaning manager moves that problematic
person into the midst of his stellar team, hoping to improve him by example.
What happens?—and the psychological literature is clear on this point.64 Does
the errant interloper immediately straighten up and fly right? No. Instead, the
entire team degenerates.
-
The delinquency spreads, not the stability.65 Down is a lot easier than up.
-
He is going on about how easy it is to fail. With this I can agree. But he also says that failure is easy to understand. Possibly. You might do everything by the book and still come up short. Failure can be easy to understand and it can be hard to understand.
page 106:
-
Maybe instead of continuing our friendship I should just go off somewhere, get
my act together, and lead by example.
-
If you surround yourself with people who support your upward aim, they will
not tolerate your cynicism and destructiveness. They will instead encourage you
when you do good for yourself and others and punish you carefully when you do
not.
page 111:
- If the internal voice makes you doubt the value of your endeavours—or your
life, or life itself—perhaps you should stop listening.
page 112:
- Standards of better or worse are not illusory or unnecessary. If you hadn’t
decided that what you are doing right now was better than the alternatives, you
wouldn’t be doing it. The idea of a value-free choice is a contradiction in
terms. Value judgments are a precondition for action.
page 113:
- you might come to realize that the specifics of the many games you are playing
are so unique to you, so individual, that comparison to others is simply
inappropriate. Perhaps you are overvaluing what you don’t have and undervaluing
what you do.
page 116:
- To hunt is to specify a target, track it, and throw at it. To gather is to
specify and to grasp. We fling stones, and spears, and boomerangs. We toss balls
through hoops, and hit pucks into nets, and curl carved granite rocks down the
ice onto horizontal bull’s-eyes. We launch projectiles at targets with bows,
guns, rifles and rockets. We hurl insults, launch plans, and pitch ideas. We
succeed when we score a goal or hit a target. We fail, or sin, when we do not
(as the word sin means to miss the mark70). ^1dee8e
page 117:
- We live within a framework that defines the present as eternally lacking and
the future as eternally better. If we did not see things this way, we would not
act at all.
page 118:
- Perhaps happiness is always to be found in the journey uphill, and not in the
fleeting sense of satisfaction awaiting at the next peak. Much of happiness is
hope, no matter how deep the underworld in which that hope was conceived.
page 120:
-
What you aim at determines what you see.
-
Interesting studies on perception:
-
The dependency of sight on aim (and, therefore, on value—because you aim at
what you value) was demonstrated unforgettably by the cognitive psychologist
Daniel Simons more than fifteen years ago.72 Simons was investigating something
called “sustained inattentional blindness.” He would sit his research subjects
in front of a video monitor and show them, for example, a field of wheat. Then
he would transform the photo slowly, secretly, while they watched. He would
slowly fade in a road cutting through the wheat. He didn’t insert some little
easy-to-miss footpath, either. It was a major trail, occupying a good third of
the image. Remarkably, the observers would frequently fail to take notice.
-
The demonstration that made Dr. Simons famous was of the same kind, but
more dramatic—even unbelievable. First, he produced a video of two teams
of three people.73 One team was wearing white shirts, the other, black. (The
two teams were not off in the distance, either, or in any way difficult to see.
The six of them filled much of the video screen, and their facial features were
close enough to see clearly.) Each team had its own ball, which they bounced
or threw to their other team members, as they moved and feinted in the small
space in front of the elevators where the game was filmed. Once Dan had his
video, he showed it to his study participants. He asked each of them to count
the number of times the white shirts threw the ball back and forth to one
another. After a few minutes, his subjects were asked to report the number of
passes. Most answered “15.” That was the correct answer. Most felt pretty
good about that. Ha! They passed the test! But then Dr. Simons asked, “Did
you see the gorilla?”
-
Was this a joke? What gorilla?
-
So, he said, “Watch the video again. But this time, don’t count.” Sure enough,
a minute or so in, a man dressed in a gorilla suit waltzes right into the middle
of the game for a few long seconds, stops, and then beats his chest in the
manner of stereotyped gorillas everywhere. Right in the middle of the screen.
Large as life. Painfully and irrefutably evident. But one out of every two of
his research subjects missed it, the first time they saw the video. It gets
worse. Dr. Simons did another study. This time, he showed his subjects a video
of someone being served at a counter. The server dips behind the counter to
retrieve something, and pops back up. So what? Most of his participants don’t
detect anything amiss. But it was a different person who stood up in the
original server’s place! “No way,” you think. “I’d notice.” But it’s “yes way.”
There’s a high probability you wouldn’t detect the change, even if the gender or
race of the person is switched at the same time. You’re blind too.
page 123:
- “Wait,” you think. “Maybe I’m not unhappy because I don’t have my boss’s job.
Maybe I’m unhappy because I can’t stop wanting that job.”
page 125:
- You cannot aim yourself at anything if you are completely undisciplined and
untutored.
page 126:
- It takes careful observation, and education, and reflection, and communication
with others, just to scratch the surface of your beliefs. Everything you value
is a product of unimaginably lengthy developmental processes, personal, cultural
and biological. You don’t understand how what you want—and, therefore, what you
see—is conditioned by the immense, abysmal, profound past. You simply don’t
understand how every neural circuit through which you peer at the world has been
shaped (and painfully) by the ethical aims of millions of years of human
ancestors and all of the life that was lived for the billions of years before
that. You don’t understand anything.
page 130:
-
It is simultaneously the will to dare set your sights at the unachievable, and
to sacrifice everything, including (and most importantly) your life. You realize
that you have, literally, nothing better to do.
-
You might start by not thinking—or, more accurately, but less trenchantly, by
refusing to subjugate your faith to your current rationality, and its narrowness
of view. This doesn’t mean “make yourself stupid.” It means the opposite. It
means instead that you must quit manoeuvring and calculating and conniving and
scheming and enforcing and demanding and avoiding and ignoring and punishing. It
means you must place your old strategies aside. It means, instead, that you must
pay attention, as you may never have paid attention before.
page 133:
-
learned to aim low, and to be patient. You are discovering who you are, and
what you want, and what you are willing to do. You are finding that the
solutions to your particular problems have to be tailored to you, personally and
precisely. You are less concerned with the actions of other people, because you
have plenty to do yourself.
-
To journey happily may well be better than to arrive successfully.…
page 140:
- appearance of triviality is deceptive: it is the things that occur every
single day that truly make up our lives, and time spent the same way over and
again adds up at an alarming rate.
page 141:
-
Each person’s private trouble cannot be solved by a social revolution, because
revolutions are destabilizing and dangerous. We have learned to live together
and organize our complex societies slowly and incrementally, over vast stretches
of time, and we do not understand with sufficient exactitude why what we are
doing works. Thus, altering our ways of social being carelessly in the name of
some ideological shibboleth (diversity springs to mind) is likely to produce far
more trouble than good, given the suffering that even small revolutions
generally produce.
-
Was it really a good thing, for example, to so dramatically liberalize the
divorce laws in the 1960s? It’s not clear to me that the children whose lives
were destabilized by the hypothetical freedom this attempt at liberation
introduced would say so. Horror and terror lurk behind the walls provided so
wisely by our ancestors.
page 147:
-
Violence, after all, is no mystery. It’s peace that’s the mystery. Violence is
the default.
-
People often get basic psychological questions backwards. Why do people take
drugs? Not a mystery. It’s why they don’t take them all the time that’s the
mystery. Why do people suffer from anxiety? That’s not a mystery. How is that
people can ever be calm? There’s the mystery. We’re breakable and mortal. A
million things can go wrong, in a million ways. We should be terrified out of
our skulls at every second. But we’re not. The same can be said for depression,
laziness and criminality.
page 152:
- Pain is more potent than pleasure, and anxiety more than hope.
page 157:
- So now we have two general principles of discipline. The first: limit the
rules. The second: Use the least force necessary to enforce those rules.
page 163:
- Parents have a duty to act as proxies for the real world—merciful proxies,
caring proxies—but proxies, nonetheless. This obligation supersedes any
responsibility to ensure happiness, foster creativity, or boost self-esteem. It
is the primary duty of parents to make their children socially desirable. That
will provide the child with opportunity, self-regard, and security.
page 178:
- Start to stop doing what you know to be wrong. Start stopping today.
page 179:
- Life is short, and you don’t have time to figure everything out on your own.
The wisdom of the past was hard-earned, and your dead ancestors may have
something useful to tell you).
page 185:
- The Delay of Gratification - When engaging in sacrifice, our forefathers began
to act out what would be considered a proposition, if it were stated in words:
that something better might be attained in the future by giving up something of
value in the present.
page 191:
- It’s time to let go. It might even be time to sacrifice what you love best, so
that you can become who you might become, instead of staying who you are.
page 198:
- But excuses—even reasons—even understandable reasons—don’t matter; not in the
final analysis.
page 199:
-
“After Auschwitz,” said Theodor Adorno, student of authoritarianism, “there
should be no poetry.” He was wrong. But the poetry should be about Auschwitz.
-
“No tree can grow to Heaven,” adds the ever-terrifying Carl Gustav Jung,
psychoanalyst extraordinaire, “unless its roots reach down to Hell.”134
page 211:
- We rebel against our own totalitarianism, as much as that of others. I cannot
merely order myself to action, and neither can you. “I will stop
procrastinating,” I say, but I don’t. “I will eat properly,” I say, but I don’t.
“I will end my drunken misbehavior,” I say, but I don’t. I cannot merely make
myself over in the image constructed by my intellect (particularly if that
intellect is possessed by an ideology). I have a nature, and so do you, and so
do we all. We must discover that nature, and contend with it, before making
peace with ourselves. What is it, that we most truly are? What is it that we
could most truly become, knowing who we most truly are? We must get to the very
bottom of things before such questions can be truly answered.
page 212:
- The philosopher of science Karl Popper, certainly no mystic, regarded thinking
itself as a logical extension of the Darwinian process. A creature that cannot
think must solely embody its Being. It can merely act out its nature,
concretely, in the here-and-now. If it cannot manifest in its behavior what the
environment demands while doing so, it will simply die. But that is not true of
human beings. We can produce abstracted representations of potential modes of
Being. We can produce an idea in the theatre of the imagination. We can test it
out against our other ideas, the ideas of others, or the world itself. If it
falls short, we can let it go. We can, in Popper’s formulation, let our ideas
die in our stead.147 Then the essential part, the creator of those ideas, can
continue onward, now untrammeled, by comparison, with error. Faith in the part
of us that continues across those deaths is a prerequisite to thinking itself.
page 213:
- It is for this reason that the depth psychologists—Freud and Jung paramount
among them—insisted that the human psyche was a battleground for ideas. An idea
has an aim. It wants something. It posits a value structure. An idea believes
that what it is aiming for is better than what it has now. It reduces the world
to those things that aid or impede its realization, and it reduces everything
else to irrelevance. An idea defines figure against ground. An idea is a
personality, not a fact. When it manifests itself within a person, it has a
strong proclivity to make of that person its avatar: to impel that person to act
it out. Sometimes, that impulsion (possession is another word) can be so strong
that the person will die, rather than allowing the idea to perish.
page 216:
- Maybe it’s not the world that’s at fault. Maybe it’s you.
page 217:
- If you decide that you are not justified in your resentment of Being, despite
its inequity and pain, you may come to notice things you could fix to reduce
even by a bit some unnecessary pain and suffering. You may come to ask yourself,
“What should I do today?” in a manner that means “How could I use my time to
make things better, instead of worse?”
page 218:
- To have meaning in your life is better than to have what you want
page 219:
- Meaning is the ultimate balance between, on the one hand, the chaos of
transformation and possibility and on the other, the discipline of pristine
order, whose purpose is to produce out of the attendant chaos a new order that
will be even more immaculate, and capable of bringing forth a still more
balanced and productive chaos and order.
page 222:
-
I trained to become a clinical psychologist at McGill University, in Montreal.
-
MK Ultra experiments were conducted here.
page 235:
- rationality is subject to the single worst temptation—to raise what it knows
now to the status of an absolute.
page 257:
- eople think they think, but it’s not true. It’s mostly self-criticism that
passes for thinking. True thinking is rare—just like true listening. Thinking is
listening to yourself. It’s difficult. To think, you have to be at least two
people at the same time. Then you have to let those people disagree. Thinking is
an internal dialogue between two or more different views of the world.
page 261:
- He suggested that his readers conduct a short experiment when they next found
themselves in a dispute: “Stop the discussion for a moment, and institute this
rule: ‘Each person can speak up for himself only after he has first restated the
ideas and feelings of the previous speaker accurately, and to that speaker’s
satisfaction.’
page 266:
- A good lecturer is not only delivering facts (which is perhaps the least
important part of a lecture), but also telling stories about those facts,
pitching them precisely to the level of the audience’s comprehension, gauging
that by the interest they are showing. The story he or she is telling conveys to
the members of the audience not only what the facts are, but why they are
relevant—why it is important to know certain things about which they are
currently ignorant. To demonstrate the importance of some set of facts is to
tell those audience members how such knowledge could change their behaviour, or
influence the way they interpret the world, so that they will now be able to
avoid some obstacles and progress more rapidly to some better goals. ^a9dfb7
page 269:
- learning from the experience of others can be quicker and much less dangerous
page 280:
- When things break down, what has been ignored rushes in.
page 287:
- Everything clarified and articulated becomes visible
page 288:
- every single voluntarily unprocessed and uncomprehended and ignored reason for
marital failure will compound and conspire and will then plague that betrayed
and self-betrayed woman for the rest of her life. The same goes for her husband.
All she—he— they—or we—must do to ensure such an outcome is nothing: don’t
notice, don’t react, don’t attend, don’t discuss, don’t consider, don’t work for
peace, don’t take responsibility. Don’t confront the chaos and turn it into
order—just wait, anything but naïve and innocent, for the chaos to rise up and
engulf you instead.
page 291:
- The psyche (the soul) and the world are both organized, at the highest levels
of human existence, with language, through communication.
page 310:
-
Girls can win by winning in their own hierarchy—by being good at what girls
value, as girls. They can add to this victory by winning in the boys’ hierarchy.
Boys, however, can only win by winning in the male hierarchy. They will lose
status, among girls and boys, by being good at what girls value.
-
Boys can’t (won’t) play truly competitive games with girls. It isn’t clear how
they can win. As the game turns into a girls’ game, therefore, the boys leave.
Are the universities —particularly the humanities—about to become a girls’ game?
page 324:
- Since all outcome inequalities must be eliminated (inequality being the heart
of all evil), then all gender differences must be regarded as socially
constructed. Otherwise the drive for equality would be too radical, and the
doctrine too blatantly propagandistic. Thus, the order of logic is reversed, so
that the ideology can be camouflaged. The fact that such statements lead
immediately to internal inconsistencies within the ideology is never addressed.
Gender is constructed, but an individual who desires gender re-assignment
surgery is to be unarguably considered a man trapped in a woman’s body (or vice
versa). The fact that both of these cannot logically be true, simultaneously, is
just ignored (or rationalized away with another appalling post-modern claim:
that logic itself—along with the techniques of science—is merely part of the
oppressive patriarchal system).
page 325:
- Here’s the fundamental problem: group identity can be fractionated right
down to the level of the individual.
page 326:
- from studies of adopted- out identical twins,190 that culture can produce a
fifteen-point (or one standard deviation) increase in IQ (roughly the difference
between the average high school student and the average state college student)
at the cost of a three-standard-deviation increase in wealth.191 What this
means, approximately, is that two identical twins, separated at birth, will
differ in IQ by fifteen points if the first twin is raised in a family that is
poorer than 85 percent of families and the second is raised in a family richer
than 95 percent of families. Something similar has recently been demonstrated
with education, rather than wealth.192
page 338:
-
if men are pushed too hard to feminize, they will become more and more
interested in harsh, fascist political ideology. Fight Club, perhaps the most
fascist popular film made in recent years by Hollywood, with the possible
exception of the Iron Man series, provides a perfect example of such inevitable
attraction.
-
I wish we could go back to fascism meaning private parties gaining control of public institutions and not totalitarianism or authoritarianism. Fight Club is literally attacking the banks, one of if not the most fascist group on the planet.
page 340:
- if you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are
capable of.
page 351:
Though thirty spokes may form the wheel,
it is the hole within the hub
which gives the wheel utility.
It is not the clay the potter throws,
which gives the pot its usefulness,
but the space within the shape,
from which the pot is made.
Without a door, the room cannot be entered,
and without its windows it is dark
Such is the utility of non-existence.212
page 355:
- Something supersedes thinking, despite its truly awesome power. When existence
reveals itself as existentially intolerable, thinking collapses in on itself. In
such situations—in the depths—it’s noticing, not thinking, that does the trick.
page 368:
- Consider, as well, that you may be blocked in your progress not because you
lack opportunity, but because you have been too arrogant to make full use of
what already lies in front of you.